Should The Pros And Cons Of Congress Have Term Limits?

Words: 493
Pages: 2

The average American is 20 years younger than the average House and Senate member. Term limits would not allow Congressmen to run for as long as they want. We already do this with the president, so the same should be done with members. Members of Congress require term limits because our country is continuously evolving with a more diverse community wanting a true and accurate representation, it would reduce the chance of corruption, and finally make more room for fresh ideas and the energy to make it come true. By not having term limits, imagine someone in Congress who is as old as your grandparents or even older. In the article “Pros and Cons of Congress age and term limits” it states “the age of the senate is getting older with the median age benign 65.3 years.” Then in the same article, it states, “The average American is 20 years younger than the average House and Senate member.” This proves that many members of Congress are becoming way too old to be members and this could affect how members think and how they do their work. …show more content…
In the Federalist 51 article it is stated by James Maddison that, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.” Then in the article “Pros and cons of Congress age and term limits” the author stated if term limits were to be installed people would have to vote for a new candidate not allowing legislators to stay in their seats for decades. Therefore, there should be term limits because power needs to be controlled or it could get out of hand. Presidents are already limited, so why should we not do the same for Congressmen? But there are people who