Ross’ letter can be viewed as an expression of subjective opinion rather than defamation. This can be argued primarily due to the fact that the letter did not directly state that Ms. Davis was professionally incapable of performing her job responsibilities. Defamation of character is descriptive of false statements whether written or verbal, about individuals which are made with the intent of slandering or harming their reputation. While this is an illegal act, it is one that is difficult to prove; hence the issues of uncertainty when these type cases are filed. First, one must provide sufficient evidence that what was said or written about them was not true. Second, once proven that the statements made are false, one must now prove that the statements were made with the intent of causing some form of harm to them. Some employer attorneys claim recent defamation of character cases are usually a tactic used to force employers to pay a large settlement to employees who are dismissed. Although employers typically win, it is a cumbersome process in which attorney fees an add up for both the plaintiff and defendant. On the other hand, attorneys who represent employees indicate that defamation lawsuits are a necessity because employers can