The first reason I believe the massacre was more the British’s fault is because one drunken British soldier was waving his sword around dangerously. A colonist, Edward Archibald, walked up to the soldier and politely asked him to stop, but the soldier got very angry and proceeded to wave the sword around more. More of the soldiers acquaintances walked out and saw the little altercation. They all wanted to take up for their friend, so naturally, a fight was started and it turned into a huge tragedy, more so for the colonists, which leads me to my next reason as to why the British are more responsible. …show more content…
The colonists had no weapons, so they stood no chance against them and conveyed no real threat towards the British. While being chased with weapons, the colonists had to protect themselves somehow, so they threw snowballs back as a way to defend themselves. So, as the reader can tell, the colonists showed no real threats toward the British, but were still killed for no reason while most of the British remained unharmed, which leads me to my next point which explains why the British are more responsible for the aftermath of this